ExamRizzBMAT
Leave

BMAT 2018 · Question 13 · Strengthening Arguments

Save

While well-intentioned, the campaign to ban tackling in school rugby constitutes an overreaction. Such a ban could lead to unintended negative consequences for the young people involved in the sport, and it must not be implemented. Many parents and others are very concerned about the potential for rugby tackling to cause head and spinal cord injuries. However, the possibility of injury is present in any sport, and the health risks associated with physical inactivity are widely understood. Also, as is the case with boxing or any other contact sport, full-contact rugby enables players to channel aggression in a positive, controlled way. It is surely better to let young people show aggression through rugby than to wait for violent behaviour to happen impulsively.

Which of the following, if true, would strengthen the above argument? 1 It is unfeasible for schools to replace rugby with other activities that can channel aggression in a controlled manner. 2 Aggression is a natural or unavoidable feature of many young people’s behaviour. 3 It is impossible to sustain head or spinal cord injuries in other sports played at schools.