SPEC 3.1.2 - MEASUREMENTS AND ERRORS
Limitations of Physical Measurements
Errors, precision, accuracy, uncertainty, and combining uncertainties
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:
Objectives
Distinguish between random and systematic errors
Define precision, accuracy, repeatability, reproducibility, resolution
Calculate absolute, fractional, and percentage uncertainties
Combine uncertainties correctly for different operations
Determine uncertainty in gradients from graphs
Types of Error
All measurements have some degree of uncertainty. Errors fall into two main categories:
Random Errors
Affect precision. Cause differences in measurements - a spread about the mean.
You cannot get rid of ALL random errors.
Systematic Errors
Affect accuracy. Cause all results to be too high or too low by the same amount.
Due to apparatus or faults in method.
Key Difference
Random errors can be reduced by repeating and averaging. Systematic errors cannot be reduced by repeating - they require identifying and eliminating the source.
Random Errors
Example: Electronic noise in circuits
To Reduce Random Errors
Take at least 3 repeats and calculate the mean (also identifies anomalies)
Use computers/data loggers/cameras to reduce human error
Use appropriate equipment with higher resolution
Systematic Errors
Examples: Zero error (balance not zeroed), parallax error (reading at wrong angle)
To Reduce Systematic Errors
Calibrate apparatus by measuring a known value
Correct for background radiation in radiation experiments
Read the meniscus at eye level to reduce parallax
Use controls in experiments
Worked Example 1
1
Identifying Error Types
A student measures the period of a pendulum 10 times. The results in seconds are: 2.03, 1.98, 2.05, 1.97, 2.02, 2.01, 1.99, 2.04, 2.00, 2.01. The true period is 2.01 s.
(a) Describe the precision and accuracy of these results.
(b) What type of error is present?
(a)
Precision: Range = 2.05 - 1.97 = 0.08 s. Small spread → precise.
•
Accuracy: Mean = 2.01 s = true value → accurate.
(b)
Scatter around mean indicates random error (likely human reaction time). No systematic error since mean = true value.
Key Definitions
TermDefinition
PrecisionMeasurements are consistent - they fluctuate slightly about a mean value. Does NOT indicate accuracy.
RepeatabilitySame experimenter, same equipment, same method → same results
ReproducibilityDifferent person, different techniques/equipment → same results
ResolutionThe smallest change in quantity that gives a recognisable change in reading
AccuracyA measurement close to the true value
Precision vs Accuracy
Think of measurements like arrows hitting a target:
Precise but NOT Accurate (Systematic Error)
Accurate but NOT Precise (Random Error)
Precise AND Accurate (The Goal!)
Remember
Precision = clustering (low random error). Accuracy = closeness to true value (low systematic error).
Worked Example 2
2
Precision vs Accuracy Analysis
Two students measure g (true value = 9.81 m s⁻²):
A: 9.2, 9.3, 9.1, 9.2, 9.3 m s⁻²
B: 9.5, 10.1, 9.8, 10.0, 9.6 m s⁻²
Compare the precision and accuracy of each student's results.
A:
Range = 0.2 m s⁻² → High precision. Mean = 9.22, error = 0.59 → Low accuracy.
B:
Range = 0.6 m s⁻² → Lower precision. Mean = 9.80, error = 0.01 → High accuracy.
•
Conclusion: A has systematic error (precise but inaccurate). B has random error only (less precise but accurate).
Worked Example 3
3
Resolution Selection
A student needs to measure the thickness of a human hair (approximately 0.08 mm). Three instruments are available:
A: 30 cm ruler (1 mm divisions)
B: Vernier caliper (0.1 mm resolution)
C: Micrometer (0.01 mm resolution)
Which instrument is most appropriate? Justify your answer.
1
Ruler (1 mm): Resolution > measurement. Unsuitable - cannot detect the measurement.
2
Vernier caliper (0.1 mm): 0.08 mm ≈ resolution. Marginal - would give ±63% uncertainty.
3
Micrometer (0.01 mm): 0.08 mm = 8× resolution. Most appropriate - gives ±6% uncertainty.
•
Conclusion: Use the micrometer. Resolution should be significantly smaller than the quantity being measured.
What is Uncertainty?
Definition
The uncertainty of a measurement is the bounds in which the accurate value can be expected to lie.
Example: A temperature reading of 20°C ± 2°C means the true value could be within 18-22°C.
Absolute Uncertainty
A fixed quantity
7 ± 0.6 V
Fractional Uncertainty
As a fraction
7 ± V
Percentage Uncertainty
As a percentage
7 ± 8.6% V
Key Formula
Readings vs Measurements
Reading
When one value is found.
Example: Reading a thermometer
Uncertainty = ± half the smallest division
Measurement
When difference between 2 readings is found.
Example: Using a ruler (start and end point)
Uncertainty = at least ± 1 smallest division
Examples
Thermometer (1°C divisions): uncertainty = ±0.5°C
Ruler (1 mm divisions): uncertainty = ±0.5 mm + ±0.5 mm = ±1 mm
Digital Readings
Uncertainty is ± the last significant digit. E.g., 3.2 V has uncertainty ±0.1 V
Uncertainty from Repeated Data
Rule
For repeated data, the uncertainty is half the range:
Express as: mean ± (range/2)
Example
Readings: 5.2, 5.4, 5.1, 5.3, 5.5 m
Mean = 5.3 m
Range = 5.5 - 5.1 = 0.4 m
Result: 5.3 ± 0.2 m
Reducing Uncertainty
Fix one end of a ruler → only one reading uncertainty
Measure multiple instances (e.g., time 10 swings, divide by 10 → uncertainty also divides by 10)
Measure larger quantities → smaller percentage uncertainty
Worked Example 4
4
Zero Error Correction
A micrometer reads +0.03 mm when fully closed (zero error). The student records readings of: 0.58 mm, 0.61 mm, 0.59 mm, 0.60 mm, 0.58 mm.
(a) What is the corrected mean diameter?
(b) What type of error is the zero reading?
(a)
Mean = (0.58+0.61+0.59+0.60+0.58)/5 = 0.592 mm
•
Zero error = +0.03 mm (positive → subtract)
•
Corrected diameter = 0.592 - 0.03 = 0.56 mm
(b)
This is a systematic error - all readings are too high by the same amount. Cannot be reduced by repeating.
Combining Uncertainties: Add/Subtract
Adding or Subtracting Data → ADD ABSOLUTE UNCERTAINTIES
E1
Temperature Difference
A thermometer with uncertainty ±0.5 K shows temperature falling from 298 ± 0.5 K to 273 ± 0.5 K. What is the difference in temperature?
Difference: 298 - 273 = 25 K
Uncertainty: 0.5 + 0.5 = 1 K
Answer: 25 ± 1 K
Important
When subtracting, you still ADD the absolute uncertainties. Uncertainties always add up - they never cancel!
Combining Uncertainties: Multiply/Divide
Multiplying or Dividing Data → ADD PERCENTAGE UNCERTAINTIES
E2
Calculating Acceleration
A force of 91 ± 3 N is applied to a mass of 7 ± 0.2 kg. Find the acceleration.
a = F/m = 91/7 = 13 m s⁻²
% uncertainty in F: (3/91) × 100 = 3.3%
% uncertainty in m: (0.2/7) × 100 = 2.9%
Total % uncertainty: 3.3% + 2.9% = 6.2%
Absolute uncertainty: 6.2% of 13 = 0.8 m s⁻²
Answer: a = 13 ± 0.8 m s⁻² (or 13 ± 6.2%)
Combining Uncertainties: Powers
Raising to a Power → MULTIPLY PERCENTAGE UNCERTAINTY BY THE POWER
E3
Area of a Circle
The radius of a circle is 5 ± 0.3 cm. Find the percentage uncertainty in the area.
Area = πr² = π × 25 = 78.5 cm²
% uncertainty in r: (0.3/5) × 100 = 6%
% uncertainty in r²: 6% × 2 = 12%
Answer: 78.5 ± 12% cm²
Why ×2?
Because r² means r × r. Each r contributes 6% uncertainty, so total = 6% + 6% = 12%. The power tells you how many times to count the uncertainty.
Combining Uncertainties: Summary
OperationRuleExample
a + b or a - bAdd absolute uncertaintiesΔ(a±b) = Δa + Δb
a × b or a ÷ bAdd percentage uncertainties%total = %a + %b
aⁿMultiply % uncertainty by n%total = n × %a
Significant Figures
Uncertainties should be given to the same number of significant figures as the data.
Worked Example 5
5
Combining Uncertainties
Calculate the kinetic energy of a ball: mass = 2.0 ± 0.1 kg, velocity = 5.0 ± 0.2 m s⁻¹. Use KE = ½mv².
1
KE = ½ × 2.0 × 5.0² = 25 J
2
% in m: (0.1/2.0) × 100 = 5%
3
% in v: (0.2/5.0) × 100 = 4%
4
% in v²: 4% × 2 = 8% (power rule)
5
Total %: 5% + 8% = 13% (multiply/divide rule)
6
Absolute: 13% × 25 = 3.25 ≈ 3 J
•
Answer: KE = 25 ± 3 J
Uncertainties on Graphs
Uncertainties are shown as error bars on graphs.
Rules
If uncertainty is 5 mm, draw error bars 5 squares either side of the point
Line of best fit should go through all error bars (excluding anomalous points)
Uncertainty in Gradient
The uncertainty in a gradient is found using lines of best and worst fit:
Method
Draw steepest and shallowest lines that must go through all error bars
Calculate gradient of best fit and worst fit lines
Uncertainty in Y-Intercept
When best and worst fit lines have different y-intercepts:
Alternative Method
Using maximum and minimum gradient lines:
Modulus Lines
The |...| symbols mean "absolute value" - always take the positive difference.
Worked Example 6
6
Gradient Uncertainty
From a graph of velocity vs time: best fit gradient = 4.5 m s⁻², steepest line = 5.1 m s⁻², shallowest line = 4.0 m s⁻². Find the percentage uncertainty in the gradient.
1
Worst gradient = steepest OR shallowest (whichever differs more from best)
•
|5.1 - 4.5| = 0.6 vs |4.0 - 4.5| = 0.5
•
Use worst = 5.1 m s⁻²
2
% uncertainty = |4.5 - 5.1|/4.5 × 100 = 0.6/4.5 × 100 = 13%
•
Answer: gradient = 4.5 ± 13% m s⁻² (or 4.5 ± 0.6 m s⁻²)
Practice Question
Question: A student times 10 swings of a pendulum and gets 6.2 ± 0.1 s. Calculate the period and its uncertainty.
1
Period = 6.2 ÷ 10 = 0.62 s
2
Uncertainty also divides by 10: 0.1 ÷ 10 = 0.01 s
3
Period = 0.62 ± 0.01 s
•
This is why timing multiple swings reduces uncertainty!
Summary
Key Rules
Random errorsAffect precision; reduce by repeating
Systematic errorsAffect accuracy; identify and eliminate source
Reading uncertainty± half smallest division
Measurement uncertainty± 1 smallest division (two readings)
Repeated datamean ± (range/2)
Add/subtractAdd absolute uncertainties
Multiply/divideAdd percentage uncertainties
Powers (xⁿ)Multiply % uncertainty by n
Next Steps
What's Next
In the next topic, we'll apply these measurement principles to mechanics - starting with scalars, vectors, and motion.
Before You Go
Test your understanding with the practice questions and end-of-lesson test. Focus on:
Identifying random vs systematic errors
Calculating uncertainties from repeated data
Combining uncertainties correctly (know which rule to use!)
Finding gradient uncertainty from graphs
Next: Learning Objectives